![]() To be honest, the only mode that I ever played at LAN parties was duel. The game types are limited to deathmatch, team deathmatch, free-for-all, and duel. Unfortunately the multiplayer is somewhat lacking. Ive been told that it also conforms to the Star Wars universe established by the movies and most books. Jedi Outcast has an excellent story-driven singleplayer that I have played about 5 times. However, in order to decide which one to purchase you may need to ask yourself whether you prefer single or multiplayer gaming. Ive played both Jedi Outcast and Jedi Academy and found both to be very enjoyable to one degree or another. Out of the series I prefer JK1 single, JK1 or JK2 multiplayer (tie) The joke in my LAN group about Academy and dual wield is that they are the noob sticks, just swing wildly and eventually they will die. And dual wielding (which in RPGs and such I love) just wasn't that great. 5 swinging) I may not be a doctor or a Jedi, but I think a lightsaber hit is gonna hurt a lot worse than a kick. Multiplayer I prefer JKII as Academy (when I played it, and supposedly patched and semi-fixed this) that it was a big kick fest (two-handed sabers got the additional attack and other can do the flip off the enemy) as kicks did a LOT more damage (25 vs. I believe Academy has a bit more replayability in that you alignment changed events (I haven't played either in a while, so that may be false). So when Beef's team (or some other dev team) makes a Quest dedicated port, PC people get miffed and it's frustrating because not only do PC people have the mods, better graphics, and all of the conversion tools and resources (like that guy that seems to be turning every modern AAA game VR), and somebody has a concern about the small base, it kinda makes me cringe a little.1.) Academy is the newest (aka Jedi Knight III)Ģ.) Between the two, there isn't a whole lot of differences, mainly now in Academy you can dual-wield lightsabers or have a two-handed/two-sided lightsaber.ģ.) I haven't honestly played Academy single-player, but from what my friends say is that Academy is fairly fun. Most devs don't even WANT to port to Quest, but do so out of necessity because of the huge install base. However, the pickings on Quest are already super slim. Yes, the VR community is small and too fractured. ![]() All that said, as a Mac owner and Standalone Quest user who has actively been engaged with VR since 2014 with GEAR/GO/PSVR/QUEST1/QUEST2.Ĭan we actually get a little love sometimes without PC folks feeling some kind of way? I mean, jeez, you guys have this already:Īs a standalone Quest owner, I try not to be too annoyed with these takes. I don't agree with most of the decisions META has made since Oculus. I freaking HATE Meta, but there's no denying that VR would be almost dead if META didn't pour it on with the Quest. Or if it looks good, "of COURSE it's PC'. PC guys love shaming with, 'this looks like crap. So when Beef's team (or some other dev team) makes a Quest dedicated port, PC people get miffed and it's frustrating because not only do PC people have the mods, better graphics, and all of the conversion tools and resources (like that guy that seems to be turning every modern AAA game VR), and somebody has a concern about the small base, it kinda makes me cringe a little. Click to shrink.As a standalone Quest owner, I try not to be too annoyed with these takes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |